Westin's Peer Reviews

Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110
Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project
Reviewers name: Westin Fisher
Paper author’s name: Gabby Peguero
Has the writer written a research paper . . .
[medium]
NO__that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
NO__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
NO__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
NO__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: The only thing that is missing is an explanation in the beginning (before or right after you reveal your thesis and research question) of how you came up with your idea and thesis during the making of your synthesis paper. Be sure to also include citations and support from How the Other Half Lives and Enrique’s Journey.

[opening & introduction]
YES__that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment: All is very well done and clear

[use of research question & thesis]
YES__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment: I thought that both the research question and thesis were clearly displayed ad well organized & developed.

[use of sources]
YES__where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?

[paragraph construction]
YES__that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment: So far I feel that your paper has a great flow to it, try to keep this on later throughout the entire paper.

[conclusion]
NO__that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment: I am hopeful that you will eventually include the conclusion once the paper is completed

[works cited and in-text citations]
NO__that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment: It was clear that you have some integrated source and in-text citations. Make sure that you keep it up throughout the rest of the paper because you are already doing a great job of this.Works Cited page is not present for now, don’t forget to include later.

[sentence-level rhetoric]
NO__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment: There were a few grammatical and punctual errors that were either caught by spell check or not. To further avoid this read over carefully after the writing process is done

Dr. Archibald’s ENGL 110

Peer Editing Process: The 3Research Project

Reviewers name: Westin Fisher

Paper author’s name: Kaila Ober


Has the writer written a research paper . . .

[medium]
NO__that joins a conversation (where there is a controversy), that listens to others who have been talking about the topic (old and new docs & sources), and then posits a unique idea(s) in an effort to extend the discussion?
YES__Or, is the paper substantially a report (a "data-dump") of what others have said?
NO__Or, is it an extended opinion piece that gives no support for the writer's ideas?
NO__Or, is it merely plagiarized? (this item trumps everything else and results in an "F" in the course.
Comment: You did include both the documents that were in your synthesis paper, however after that you need to clearly give your own opinion on the controversy through stating your thesis, research question and forecast.

[opening & introduction]
NO & YES__that contains an opening to the paper that hooks the reader and introduces the writer and his/her purpose for writing the essay? Is there a forecast of what the paper will contain?
Comment:I like how you began the paper because it was attention grabbing. The purpose of your paper is unclear because there is no evident thesis early on. I recommend adding a forecast right in the beginning but not until your paper is complete because then you can summarize what you plan to cover more easily

[use of research question & thesis]
NO__where they employ their research question that then is answered in a thesis and set forward in the paper?
Comment: Very Important

[use of sources]
YES__where the writer introduce his/her sources, summarize, paraphrase, and/or quote them, and then provide a comment for each one that advances their thesis?

[paragraph construction]
NO__that contains an argument that flows--claim, support, result?
Comment:Needs to be clearer on what argument you are trying to support and at times the paper is repetitive and jumps around too often

[conclusion]
NO__that contains a conclusion that works to sum up or extend the ideas of the paper?
Comment: I am sure you will later have one

[works cited and in-text citations]
YES__that contains well integrated sources, a Works Cited page, and In-text citations conform to the MLA format?
Comment:You did a great job of including plenty of citations for support of your ideas. You should have no problem listing enough sources within your works cited

[sentence-level rhetoric]
YES__where the writer has edited the paper carefully for grammatical and punctuation errors?
Comment: Little to none errors found